Welcome to F.I.E.L.D.- the First Ismaili Electronic Library and Database. Guests are not required to login during this beta-testing phase

Copyright Lawsuit: Defenses Glorifying the Aga Khan filed in federal Court - 2010-04-29

Date: 
Thursday, 2010, April 29
Location: 
Source: 
Heritage News
20100429-court-filings.jpg

In a surprisingly rapid twist of events, both Mr Tajdin and Mr Jiwa have filed their respective statements of Defense this 29th of April 2010. They affirm to being devoted followers who will unconditionally abide by the wishes of the Aga Khan, whom they glorify in their defense.

Mr Tajdin declares that:

He has not been served yet but the ethics imposed upon him by his faith demands that he should not keep in ignorance the public by being silent on the issue and should clarify all of the facts, pertaining to this lawsuit, of which he is aware.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of his wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

He has been printing Farman books since 1992 with approval and instructions from the Imam received on August 15, 1992 in Montreal.

He has not received any communication from the Imam from 1992 to 2009 instructing him to stop publication.

He cannot stop publication without instruction from the Imam as this would be a breach of his oath of allegiance to the Imam.

All Farman publications were financial deficit projects done as a volunteer service and large numbers of books were distributed free of charge.

Farman sharing is a historic Ismaili tradition which still continues today.

The current Ismaili Constitution does not restrict the right to publish Farmans

Mr Tajdin concludes that:

He has no choice but to await further direct instructions from the Imam.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of His wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

Mr Jiwa states that:

"This action does not appear to have been authorized personally by the Aga Khan .."

"In distributing Farman books obtained from Tajdin to other Ismailis, he has not violated either the Ismaili Constitution or any Farmans"

He has not violated the copyright act as "Tajdin was given express authority by the Imam" and regardless of the fact that "the limitations period provided for by the Copyright Act also bars this action as the books containing the Farmans were commenced publication in the year 1992", he will still do whatever the Imam tells him to do.

Mr Jiwa clarifies finances:

He "obtains these books for C$50.00 and sells them for C$50.00 or gives them free, without any profit.

"All monies received by him from the sale of (other) books after 2005 were delivered to the Jamatkhanas"

Mr Jiwa further states that:

"If the Imam edited the Farman before releasing to the Jamats, in effect he is superceding the Farman he made orally previously."

He "unconditionally reconfirms his oath of allegiance to his Imam" and "if the Imam does not desire his Farman books to be distributed to the Jamats (...) this defendant will submit to the instructions of His Imam without reservation whatsoever"

Replies From the Plaintiff are due within 10 days, and Affidavits of Documents are due 30 days later.

[Update from May 6: Ogilvy Renault, the law firm which launched the case has asked for an extension of 15 days to reply to the Defense. They claim delays due to breakdown of email servers, blackberry communication, travel of senior lawyer, time difference with Paris etc...The more delays in this file, the more damage it creates to the reputation of the Ismaili community, the Imam and the defendants. It is to the advantage of all parties that this case be withdrawn from the courts.]

[Update from June 22: Defendants have filed a Motion for summary Judgement to have the case dismissed.]

[Update from September 5:
Online Book that gathers court materials as well as articles that are currently available for the ongoing 2010 Lawsuit:

Copyright Lawsuit 2010: Online Book of All available Materials
News on cross-examinations:
Copyright Lawsuit: CROSS_EXAMINATIONS Table of Contents - 2010-09-04
Latest Development
Copyright Lawsuit: Imam Appears for Discovery and Ends the Case - 2010-10-15
As users are asking to read the letters from Nagib and Alnaz on the court docket, the latest have been attached on the following link:
A. Various Court Filings

Revised Factums have been posted Here:
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment : Plaintiffs Revised Combined Factums of Reply and of Motion
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment: Defendants' Revised Factums of Motion and of Reply

There has been proven fraud in the recent past in the Aga Khan's domain by the Aga Khan's agents:
Aga Khan Lawsuit: Fraud at Aga Khan Studs - 2000-02-22

2011-05-25: A Jamati Member who has never met the Defendants volunteered as his brotherly duty to pay the $30,000 that was demanded in the Plaintiff''s submissions and that was accordingly ordered by the judge.
Read the full details of the $30,000 payment directly to H.H. The Aga Khan.

2011-06-16: The Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law against the Summary Judgment has been filed in court by the defendants on June 16th, 2011.
Read the Full Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law

Link to Court Docket Case T-514-10
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-60-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-59-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-156-13

Latest News Comments

AttachmentSize
Tajdin Defence Apr 29.10.pdf491.02 KB
Jiwa AK Defence Apr 29.10.pdf543.82 KB

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
So if the constitution is by Integrity (not verified)
Some Interested E mails to me,Worth to be discussed here,soon..! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Our faith is not divided by bloglaw (not verified)
@Alnaz by Yasmin (not verified)
@Chai by Yasmin (not verified)
Oath , allegiance & constitution by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Chai (smiling) by Alnaz (not verified)
I had a feeling that you by Chai (not verified)
Obviously no one knows human by librarian-umed
@interpret it as you will by Alnaz (not verified)
Intervention Definition: the by bloglaw (not verified)
Let me try to by bloglaw (not verified)
your view by Chai (not verified)
The problem by Bloglaw (not verified)
That reference was to by Bloglaw (not verified)
GJ version - English by Sadrudin (not verified)
You are right. But It is not by Bloglaw (not verified)
And Imam said in Tanzania by @mansoorali (not verified)
Farmans not being read in JK by Imani (not verified)
An Important Message from MHI to all ,at Nairobi on 23 july 2011 by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@Bloglaw re: Feb. 26 (Annotations...) - Clarification by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
This discussion also shows by Integrity (not verified)
Read again and carefully by Bloglaw (not verified)
@MHI and intervention...... by Alnaz (not verified)
@Bloglaw and farmans.. by Alnaz (not verified)
Yes, but he also said: by Chai (not verified)
When I say Mawla Is in by Bloglaw (not verified)
Dear Mansoorali bhai. I by bloglaw (not verified)
Alnaz may be right, I think; by bloglaw (not verified)
I would think that Imam was by librarian-umed
It is a duty placed by Imam by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Imam in control. by Alnaz (not verified)
@Bloglaw and Farmans by Alnaz (not verified)
Imam does not dictate or by @integrity (not verified)
Al Waezs and Mukhis are not by very concerned & Mansoorali (not verified)
Annotations & Process by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Integrity re: Feb. 25 post (To all leaders...) by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
The institutions are for the by @chsi (not verified)
You are right and the by Bloglaw (not verified)
About this post on "Moongu by librarian-umed
I think the first formal by librarian-umed
When a new Mukhi is by Bloglaw (not verified)
Imam is alway in control of by Bloglaw (not verified)
@ Dear Bloglaw.............Yes .......! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@ Dear Bloglaw.............Yes .......! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
reply by nasim (not verified)
Very simply ... by Chai (not verified)
Moongu Ndogo ! by @ Alnaz (not verified)
To all our Leaders; Shafik by integrity Open letter (not verified)
@Discards. by Alnaz (not verified)
7th category by Integrity (not verified)
And we have the promise of by librarian-umed
Imams always guide us ! by Bloglaw (not verified)
No ... by Chai (not verified)
Jamat esoecially in the West by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Abdullah re: loss of essentials. by Alnaz (not verified)
Sadrudin's silence. by Alnaz (not verified)
 IIS  is run by SS and Co by Integrity @ mansoorali (not verified)
I think you are right and we by Concerned (not verified)
Dear Mansoorali bhai. I by bloglaw (not verified)
i requir to clarify ....in post on LIF ....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Thanks to those ....for E mail Communications with me....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
I am on spiritual fast by Imani (not verified)
IMAM said.......in 1969....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
You need to look and read by Bloglaw (not verified)
I went to your link, it is by librarian-umed
The Farman by absolute authority (not verified)
Imam says we must all act by Bloglaw (not verified)
Still not seeing it by Dbk (not verified)
Absolute power is never good by Integrity (not verified)
Imam and our constitution by Pluralism vs totalitarianism (not verified)
The answer by @dbk (not verified)
50%... by Dbk (not verified)
In this global classroom I by murad (not verified)
You say you will defend the by Integrity (not verified)
@Mansoorali by Yasmin (not verified)
So your responsibilty ends by Bloglaw (not verified)
An Ismaili point of view. As by integrity @ Bloglaw (not verified)
Did you know there are by concerned (not verified)
Many Judges err that is why by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Mansoorali re: Our Lif... by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
@Bloglaw-The appeal judges erred by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
@Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani re: Feb. 21 by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Blocked guidance by Chai (not verified)
@ Chai .......! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
The appeal judges erred – by bloglaw (not verified)
Where are you .......on FAST .....?! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Replace with whom!!! by kachoomber (not verified)
@Imani - Quran by Sadrudin (not verified)
@Integrity - agree about what? by Sadrudin (not verified)
@ Alnaz.....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
So to you do nothing and by Bloglaw (not verified)
You say we have come a long by @chai (not verified)
Literature by Imani (not verified)
@ Sadruddin ....a request ...! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
As I have said, if you write by Bloglaw (not verified)
@ Sadruddin.......! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
If you are a good Ismaili by Concerned (not verified)
Why tell others and do the by Amin (not verified)
Mr Sadrudin, so you agree by Integrity (not verified)
@Mansoorali - you can live in your dogmas by Sadrudin (not verified)
@sadrudin by Alnaz (not verified)
@Bloglaw - thanks for labeling me SS & Co by Sadrudin (not verified)
What action ? by Chai (not verified)
@ Wait for Second part of Story ...! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@ Sadruddin - what are you up to , ARJUN or DURYODHAN ?! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
So you say someone in Indoa by @Sadrudin (not verified)
LIF - Puppet or chamchas? by Bloglaw (not verified)
You are living in a different reality by Bloglaw (not verified)
Approach your local government by Sadrudin (not verified)
Imam teaching by Chai (not verified)
@ Sadruddin by Imani (not verified)
Our LIF - Role as - IMPORTANT or IMPOTENT ?! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
What the Court said is that by librarian-umed
If Imam gave consent to one by Ali (not verified)
Thankfully that is why there by Bloglaw (not verified)
Leaders by Chai (not verified)
@Alibhai (wonderful post) by Alnaz (not verified)
It is the matter of Aga Khan by Sadrudin (not verified)
I agree with Sadrudin on this point by Alibhai Jiwani (not verified)
@ Sadruddun ..Towards ..i bet you ....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@mansooarali bhai by Alnaz (not verified)
Replace with whom!!! by Concerned (not verified)
You say "in pur Dua we are by @sadrudin (not verified)
That is right and copyright by Amin (not verified)
For those who "misunderstand by integrity @ Chai (not verified)
@ Sadrudin by librarian-umed
Thank you Mansoorali. by Bloglaw (not verified)
The Law is similar where Mr by Bloglaw (not verified)
@ Sadruddin on his response to my post.....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
The king by Chai (not verified)
@ Umed by Alibhai Jiwani (not verified)
Thanks for Interested Response ....!. by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Reverse onus by boglaw @ Nora (not verified)
Any Comparision......?! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@ Mansoorali - ismaili is a cult by Sadrudin (not verified)
In their decision the Judges by kachoomber (not verified)
In their decision the Judges by librarian-umed
Three 3 critical issues - India case by @ Mansoorali; (not verified)
Murids not entitled to Farmans ! by Blolaw (not verified)
NCAB chairman is wrong to by Integrity (not verified)
Obviously another stunt by SS by librarian-umed
Next week was to day only ?...as per National Council ....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
A clarification ......about meeting/s with Board Officials .! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
ISSUES in Hon Court ......in ITREB case .....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Reading of Bhagwat in front of buffalo by Sadrudin (not verified)
application to dismiss (India case) by Bloglaw (not verified)
please wait - i am on the way to post ISSUES framed ....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Princess Zahara to visit India next week ....! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
About 3 Cases in Hon Court in India...what happened on 14/2/2012 by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
Certainly more reason to by integrity (not verified)
Talika - Meaning ! by amin (not verified)
Personal greed by Imani (not verified)
Muhammed, Maybe I don't by Bloglaw (not verified)
Personal greed and interest by librarian-umed
This is not an argument but by Iman (not verified)
I agree we must all do what by Integrity (not verified)
We respect the fact that by librarian-umed
I think Imams priority is by Amin (not verified)
Firmans first for us and for all through us by kachoomber (not verified)
Unlike the LIF announcement, by Bloglaw (not verified)
@librarian-umed - FARMANS by Muhammad (not verified)
Thanks. I did not realise by Murad (not verified)
Re: are SS... by Chai (not verified)
Farmans first for us and for all through us by integrity (not verified)
Anyone can become an Ismaili by Blogkaw (not verified)
I would think Farmans for by librarian-umed
Firmans for Ismailis by Chai (not verified)
Election can not work, they by librarian-umed
Elections of Leaders by Muhammad (not verified)
 Farmans and Imams are for by @Imams Tawil and Talim (not verified)
If SS MM and AB were the top by Bloglaw (not verified)
Logical,s sugestion by Gupt (not verified)
The root of the problem by Worried (not verified)
Knowing that Imam wants all by Integrity (not verified)
Thank you for sharing. It by Concerned (not verified)
About 3 Cases in Hon Courts in India ....what next ...! by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
@ Logical by Mansoorali Abdulrahim Noorani (not verified)
The Solution by Bloglaw (not verified)
@dais and farmans.... by Alnaz (not verified)
Annotation reflection by kachhoomber (not verified)
Annotation reflection by Miss-reflective-mood (not verified)
Eji Ek andhaari ne ek by Jenny (not verified)
Time to close this thread by Logical (not verified)
PLAINTIFF attended on Oct 15??? by kachoomber (not verified)
Plaintiffs attended that day! by Nagib Tajdin (not verified)
Imam Himself made the distinction by nagib (not verified)
Words have different meanings??? by Concerned Always!! (not verified)
@annotate and change by Iman (not verified)
Fatimid Caliphate by OBSERVER (not verified)
Imam said Imam will be by Momin (not verified)
Imam said Imam does not edit by Bloglaw (not verified)
@annotate and change by Alnaz (not verified)
Why did MHI paused the Mehmani Programs? by alibhai Jiwani (not verified)
The meaning of the word by librarian-umed
Annotate, edit, change by Words have multiple meanings... (not verified)
Easier to understand that by bloglaw (not verified)
Needs more legal reasons.. by Believer (not verified)
Bloglaw - obeying? by kachoomber (not verified)
What will history say ! by concerned (not verified)
You are 100% right. Hazar by Amin (not verified)
One of many legal reasons, by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Bloglaw - obeying? by Sadrudin (not verified)
You are right that you are by Bloglaw (not verified)
These murids were obeying by Bloglaw (not verified)
@ Sad. by librarian-umed
@ Sadrudin by librarian-umed
What is equally important is by Bloglaw (not verified)
with whom defendants were willing to sign by Sadrudin (not verified)
@ integrity: I think the same by Alibhai Jiwani (not verified)
@plaintiff and silence. by Concerned (not verified)
facts not speculation by integrity (not verified)
@integrity - we need facts! by Sadrudin (not verified)
So do the defendants have a leave to Appeal? by Alibhai Jiwani (not verified)
You are very wrong Mr by integrity (not verified)
First receive leave to file the case! by Sadrudin (not verified)
To Err is human ! by legalpoint (not verified)
@sadrudin by Alnaz (not verified)
@ sadrudin, In the presence by concerned murid (not verified)
@ Sadrudin by Nagib Tajdin (not verified)
asking HI by Sadrudin (not verified)
@MSMS and likes of Yezid by Alnaz (not verified)
@Alibhai Jiwani re: Jan. 26th post by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
@Umed re: link (Jan. 26) by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
@Alibhai Jiwani re: Jan. 27th post by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
@telling the truth by AB and others.... by Concerned (not verified)
Where are the Annotations ? by Integrity (not verified)
3 key messages from Imam by BloglawI (not verified)
@ bloglaw by alibhai Jiwani USA (not verified)
Significant Question by bloglaw (not verified)
copyright admitted and Mehmani by Bloglaw (not verified)
@bloglaw: why missing main point..... by Alnaz (not verified)
change course or resign by Amin (not verified)
I suppose the statement of by librarian-umed
Have you ever wondered why? by Alibhai Jiwani USA (not verified)
LIF were not consulted as a by bloglaw (not verified)
Question about the payment by someone (not verified)
@ Integrity by librarian-umed
Especially when LIF say in by Integrity (not verified)
French Police by Muhammad (not verified)
If the leaders in question by bloglaw (not verified)
many people have offered to by Nagib Tajdin (not verified)
Appeal Court Judgment by librarian-umed
I am amazed!! I don't get it!! by alibhai Jiwani USA (not verified)
Reading again what Shafik by Bloglaw (not verified)
Alibhai Jiwani re: by kachoomber (not verified)
kachoomber by kachoomber (not verified)
If Nagib and Alnaz go to by abdul (not verified)
@Nagib and Alnaz by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
@Alibhai Jiwani re: Jan. 21 post (Nagib and Alnaz) by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
@Bloglaw re: Jan. 24th post (If Imam...) by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
@Nagib re: farman by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
@Alnaz and Bloglaw (Jan. 24) by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
The permission to Nanowisdom by Bloglaw (not verified)
@ Kachoomber by librarian-umed
There are no key issues for Ismailes by kachoomber (not verified)
@Permission by Alnaz (not verified)
If Imam did not , and If by Bloglaw (not verified)
@Bloglaw re: Jan. 22nd post by Abdullah (Canada) (not verified)
Very well put !!! by Alnaz (not verified)
Waste of Imamat funds by Bloglaw (not verified)
Hollow Victory by Observer (not verified)
@justice or what. by Interesting !! (not verified)
There are no key issues for Ismailies by Sadrudin (not verified)
leaders lobbying by ali (not verified)
stronger link by librarian-umed
@police by Alnaz (not verified)
May Mawla continue to guide by integrity (not verified)
Key issue for Ismailies by bloglaw (not verified)
The matter has not YET been by Nagib (not verified)
Possible Criminal Charges by Muhammad (not verified)
@Alnaz (Jan. 21) by Kanize (Canada) (not verified)
Unless you can link Justice by Kericho (not verified)
Possible criminal charges by Sadrudin (not verified)
Careful by Dbk (not verified)
Thank you. These are by Concerned (not verified)
MHI and us in the same boat??! by Alnaz (not verified)
Bravo by Ilakhani (not verified)

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <b> <i> <pre> <hr> <p> <!>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Use <bib>...</bib> to insert automatically numbered references.
  • You may use [acidfree:xx] tags to display acidfree videos or images inline.

More information about formatting options

To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.


Back to top