Welcome to F.I.E.L.D.- the First Ismaili Electronic Library and Database.

Copyright Lawsuit: Defenses Glorifying the Aga Khan filed in federal Court - 2010-04-29

Date: 
Thursday, 2010, April 29
Location: 
Source: 
Heritage News
20100429-court-filings.jpg

In a surprisingly rapid twist of events, both Mr Tajdin and Mr Jiwa have filed their respective statements of Defense this 29th of April 2010. They affirm to being devoted followers who will unconditionally abide by the wishes of the Aga Khan, whom they glorify in their defense.

Mr Tajdin declares that:

He has not been served yet but the ethics imposed upon him by his faith demands that he should not keep in ignorance the public by being silent on the issue and should clarify all of the facts, pertaining to this lawsuit, of which he is aware.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of his wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

He has been printing Farman books since 1992 with approval and instructions from the Imam received on August 15, 1992 in Montreal.

He has not received any communication from the Imam from 1992 to 2009 instructing him to stop publication.

He cannot stop publication without instruction from the Imam as this would be a breach of his oath of allegiance to the Imam.

All Farman publications were financial deficit projects done as a volunteer service and large numbers of books were distributed free of charge.

Farman sharing is a historic Ismaili tradition which still continues today.

The current Ismaili Constitution does not restrict the right to publish Farmans

Mr Tajdin concludes that:

He has no choice but to await further direct instructions from the Imam.

He reaffirms his allegiance to the Aga Khan, is willing to submit to any of His wishes, and is ready to surrender himself and all his possessions to the Imam.

Mr Jiwa states that:

"This action does not appear to have been authorized personally by the Aga Khan .."

"In distributing Farman books obtained from Tajdin to other Ismailis, he has not violated either the Ismaili Constitution or any Farmans"

He has not violated the copyright act as "Tajdin was given express authority by the Imam" and regardless of the fact that "the limitations period provided for by the Copyright Act also bars this action as the books containing the Farmans were commenced publication in the year 1992", he will still do whatever the Imam tells him to do.

Mr Jiwa clarifies finances:

He "obtains these books for C$50.00 and sells them for C$50.00 or gives them free, without any profit.

"All monies received by him from the sale of (other) books after 2005 were delivered to the Jamatkhanas"

Mr Jiwa further states that:

"If the Imam edited the Farman before releasing to the Jamats, in effect he is superceding the Farman he made orally previously."

He "unconditionally reconfirms his oath of allegiance to his Imam" and "if the Imam does not desire his Farman books to be distributed to the Jamats (...) this defendant will submit to the instructions of His Imam without reservation whatsoever"

Replies From the Plaintiff are due within 10 days, and Affidavits of Documents are due 30 days later.

[Update from May 6: Ogilvy Renault, the law firm which launched the case has asked for an extension of 15 days to reply to the Defense. They claim delays due to breakdown of email servers, blackberry communication, travel of senior lawyer, time difference with Paris etc...The more delays in this file, the more damage it creates to the reputation of the Ismaili community, the Imam and the defendants. It is to the advantage of all parties that this case be withdrawn from the courts.]

[Update from June 22: Defendants have filed a Motion for summary Judgement to have the case dismissed.]

[Update from September 5:
Online Book that gathers court materials as well as articles that are currently available for the ongoing 2010 Lawsuit:

Copyright Lawsuit 2010: Online Book of All available Materials
News on cross-examinations:
Copyright Lawsuit: CROSS_EXAMINATIONS Table of Contents - 2010-09-04
Latest Development
Copyright Lawsuit: Imam Appears for Discovery and Ends the Case - 2010-10-15
As users are asking to read the letters from Nagib and Alnaz on the court docket, the latest have been attached on the following link:
A. Various Court Filings

Revised Factums have been posted Here:
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment : Plaintiffs Revised Combined Factums of Reply and of Motion
2010-11-29 Summary Judgment: Defendants' Revised Factums of Motion and of Reply

There has been proven fraud in the recent past in the Aga Khan's domain by the Aga Khan's agents:
Aga Khan Lawsuit: Fraud at Aga Khan Studs - 2000-02-22

2011-05-25: A Jamati Member who has never met the Defendants volunteered as his brotherly duty to pay the $30,000 that was demanded in the Plaintiff''s submissions and that was accordingly ordered by the judge.
Read the full details of the $30,000 payment directly to H.H. The Aga Khan.

2011-06-16: The Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law against the Summary Judgment has been filed in court by the defendants on June 16th, 2011.
Read the Full Appeal Memorandum of Fact and Law

Link to Court Docket Case T-514-10
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-60-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-59-11
Link to Court Docket Appeal A-156-13

Latest News Comments

AttachmentSize
Tajdin Defence Apr 29.10.pdf491.02 KB
Jiwa AK Defence Apr 29.10.pdf543.82 KB

Comments

Next Steps ...

Letter as received - " Read and help by doing what Imam is asking you to do. Help the Jamat.

A The Cases in court in Mumbai – Next hearing 20 March 2013;
1 ITREB - not giving all Farmans, or constitution to the Jamats -
2 NCAB – Not acting and following our constitution, Farmans or the Law
3 National Council - not following Farmans, the constitution or the law -
4 Diamond Jubilee Trust - Collect money in JK from the Jamat and not giving information – submit arguments stage- (Read the issues below)

B Why are the cases in Court – root causes
Top Leaders are not doing what Hazar Imam is telling them to do in Farmans and our constitution; (see Farmans below) . Including
1 When they met murids, instead of dialogue and conciliation, some are threatening muirds
2 Refusing dialogue to resolve issues and address the needs and concerns of murids in question and generally.
3 Not giving farmans, information and the constitution to the Jamats.
4 Those who ask are marginalized instead of being welcomed
5 not giving reports of the Jamat and for the Jamat, to the Jamat
6 Making decisions and orders under Indian law, without giving the constitution, farmans or the law to the Jamats.
The solution is to work together and share all Farmans and reports. They are for the Jamat and belong to the Jamat
.
C The draft Issues submitted to the court by the Jamat/Murids
.
1 ITREB NCAB and the national Council are legally operating, and act under the Indian Law as judicial bodies. Are they allowed to do so and if so under what provisions of the Indian Law. If not are they not acting legally. Should they not give this information to the community members ?
2 NCAB , grant divorce and or grant permission to divorce , to spouses ? Are they legally authorized to do so under Indian Law, and even If one of the parties are not willing or says no.
3 ITREB supports the activities and orders of NCAB and are making announcements in Jamatkhanas (prayer hall ) of the decisions and orders of NCAB. Are they legally authorized to do so in law ?
4 National Council who control the announcements in JK allow ITREB and NCABS to do so and do so on their behalf. Are these legal under indian Law ?
5 If the dispute could not be solved between the parties by conciliation and arbitration and dialogue, then should legally NCAB be advising the parties to go to the courts, instead of forcing their decisions on the parties.
6 Can NCAB warn (force/coerce) any parties not to go to the Courts, if they do not wish to do so under Indian law – Should they be given the option.
7 Should the Quran, with all Farmans, Ginans and constitutions including all reports be made available to all the members of the community.
8 Is there a difference and should there be a difference in proceedings before the of "concilliation and arbitration Biards " and " Courts of Law "
9 Are NCABS running parallel courts in India for the smaili muslim community, and is this against the law in India
10 Regarding all the judgments given by NCABS judicially as a court. Should the Judgements be cancelled and or revised if they are not under the law and do NCAB have authority to do so under the law. ,
11 Can ITREB, Council and NCAB directly or indirectly;
a. stop any members , from making any complaint of criminal offences , against any community members or others , who are accused - offenders of serious offences under IPC ( Indian Penal Code ) etc,
b. stop them from going to any outside legal authority , like police station , Courts ? . By doing so , they are allowing offenders to get away with impunity , and ,
i. Allowing offenders to escape from criminal acts and liabilities , and or help offenders to regularize their criminal offences into genuine acts.
ii. By doing so IIREB NCAB and Council - boards council - members , are helping criminals, should also be considered, as the criminals ? ,

D What Hazar Imam says you must do !

1 NCAB, ITREB, Councils our Other Institutions
Institutions are there to serve all murids equally, not specific sections of the Jamat (for example those Shafik Sachedina and Company); “ .. You are one Jamat and the institutions are there to serve the whole of the family (jamat). .. I do not wish that the institutions should serve only specific sections of the jamat.. Imam said in London my leaders are not teeling you, meaning hey must tell you and if they don’t ask them to tell you.
2 Discussion and Conciliation
.. Our Jamat is one large Family. And just as problems between families, individuals in the Jamat should always be solved by arbitration, by discussion and friendship 9 Dec 1964
3 When matters are going wrong !
if matters are going wrong they should be put right without shame. There is no shame in saying this has gone wrong, let us put it right.,.
4 Rumors
“.I must warn you of rumors, & free talk.. There are ayats of Quran, beware of those who lead you astray beware not to be led by people who spread rumors ...remember that these matters are essential 14 Dec 1973
-Always, seek mediation and conciliation.
-Always, avoid courts of law, & related legal cost, with uncertainty and in some cases there can be injustice because the judicial system is sometimes corrupt.
-Always, find ways and solutions to meet and resolve differences, and
-Never, get into a situation where we cannot resolve differences by mediation and conciliation
-Never, let differences and conflict become a part of our psyche.
-We must always mediate at the earliest.


Back to top